Steward Observatory Bok Telescope 90Prime Camera Data from 09/11/2013 Observations were taken in clear, non-photometric conditions. The field observed is the central point of the CFHT W1 field at RA=34.5d DEC=-7d. The seeing was roughly 1.3". Details of the 90Prime camera and detector are given here: http://cameras.itl.arizona.edu/Detectorinformation.html The list of images are: bok.000[1-3].fits : 300s exposures in g-band bok.000[5-8].fits : 300s exposures in r-band The images have been detrended according to the following steps: 1. A mean bias level for each amplifier was removed with the IRAF colbias task. 2. A 2D bias frame was created from 10 bias exposures taken at the beginning of the night and then subtracted from the science images to remove residual bias structure. 3. Flat field images were generated from dome flat sequences obtained at the end of the night, and then divided from the science images. 4. SExtractor was used to identify object detections and construct a smooth background model from the sky pixels. The smooth background was then normalized and divided from the images as a crude correction to large-scale flat field variations. 5. Small corrections were applied to the nominal WCS provided in the image headers at the telescope to approximately align the images with SDSS stars in the field. The image units are in ADU and the per-amplifier gains are provided in the FITS headers. No photometric or astrometric calibration was performed (beyond the first-order shifts applied to the WCS). Notes: * No guiding was enabled at the telescope during the 5min. exposures. The Bok has very stable tracking; however, there may be slight trailing due to the lack of guiding. SCUSS, e.g., used 150s exposures and did not report trailing issues. * It was not possible to obtain sky flats because of weather constraints. Furthermore, the telescope was only on-sky for a few hours at the end of the last night of the run due to storm activity in early September, thus there are no images from which to obtain supersky flats. The flat-fielding is probably not optimal and not reflective of the calibration uncertainty that could be achieved under better conditions. Contact information: Ian McGreer imcgreer@as.arizona.edu 520-626-1476 Xiaohui Fan fan@as.arizona.edu 520-626-7558